/

 
 

Belle W. Baruch Institute for Marine & Coastal Sciences

 

 

 

Coastal Carolina Department of Marine Science

 

 

Home
 

 Project Proposal


Staff


Calendar


Photo Gallery



Baruch Marine
Field Lab


Coastal Carolina
University


CCU: Department of
Marine Science


University of
South Carolina


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The LINKS Project

     The LINKS project is designed to explore relationships between nekton and nutrient processing in three phases.  The first year (2005) we are focusing on intertidal pools and creeks, where we are making simultaneous measurements of changes in nutrients in the presence of nekton.  The second and third phases will continue to explore relationships between nekton and nutrient processing at a larger scale in concert to the examination of nekton site fidelity and spatial growth among various intertidal creeks.

Phase 1 (Summer 2005) 

   Quantifying the nutrients associated with the behavioral and physiological activities of  MLO's is a challenging goal in a dynamic tidal system.  In the first phase of study, the LINKS team uses multiple approaches including habitat mapping and a set of experiments designed to determine whether changes in nutrient levels within isolated intertidal creek pools could be related to the presence of nekton.

Habitat Mapping

     The LINKS crew is mapping the creeks in which studies are or will be conducted in order to understand the relationship between the results of our experiments and the geomorphology of individual creeks.  Creek width and bottom composition is measured and characterized.  Bottom composition falls into one of three categories: mud (a vast majority of the square meter is covered in mud), rubble (a mixture of mud and shell bottom), or oyster reef (primarily shell bottom, with live oysters).  Elevations are measured every five meters up the creek axis by creating a level line between two stakes on each side of the marsh.  Using aerial photographs and the data collected through our mapping techniques, we will be able to develop an accurate model of the creek's geomorphology.  This information will be used to determine the proportions of different subsystems within the intertidal creek basins. These data will then be combined with nekton sampling next year to determine relationships between nekton use of subsystems and nutrient concentrations in the water.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lisa Knott, Kim Foley, and Josh Rabon employ varying sampling techniques.

Pool Experiments

    In this first phase, we are taking advantage of pools that remain isolated for several hours during low tide.  The pools are chosen by location, size, and degree of isolation.  Ideally, a pool becomes completely isolated from water flow in and out at low tide. At least one sample (but up to five samples) is taken every 15 minutes until the pool is no longer isolated due to the flooding tide.  A water quality instrument is placed in the pool throughout the experiment to record water temperature, depth, dissolved oxygen, turbidity and pH.  Back in the lab, the water samples are analyzed for ammonium, nitrate, phosphate, total nitrogen, total phosphorous and total suspended sediments (organic and inorganic materials).  Different conditions are used per experiment to understand the variation in nutrient levels due to MLO's.  For example, in one experiment we constructed a fence around each pool and excluded nekton. In another experiment, extra nekton were added to the pool to "spike" the number of fishes within the pool.  Experiments have also been conducted at night, to determine nutrient levels when photosynthesis is not occurring.  By using various techniques to manipulate the amount of nekton in the pool we can understand the contribution of nekton towards the total amount of nutrients within the pool.  Along with taking water samples every 15 minutes during an experiment, seines and lift nets are used at the conclusion of each experiment to capture as many nekton as possible.  The nekton are then counted, weighed, and a subsample is taken to approximate the length and weight distributions within the pool.  These data may help us make correlations concerning nekton size and quantity and relationships to total nutrients and rate of change of nutrient levels within the pool. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pulling the lift net at the conclusion of a pool experiment

 

Phase II (Summer 2006)

    During phase II of the study we are continuing to examine the effects nekton have on intertidal pool nutrient concentrations within natural and experimental intertidal pools.  In addition to our experiments, we are also monitoring selected creeks to identify species composition, biomass, and species specific growth rates of the major MLO species, which typically inhabit intertidal creeks during summer months.

Small Mesocosm Experiments

    In addition to nekton, the water and sediments contain bacteria and other small organisms that excrete nutrients into the water.  To quantify the effects that both sediment and nekton have on water nutrient levels we are conducting a set of replicated experiments using small mesocosms to mimic a natural tidal pool while controlling the constituents of our experimental pools.  In these experiments small tubs are placed at the bottom of an intertidal creek as the tide is ebbing.  Equal numbers of tubs are then randomly selected to contain one of three treatments: nekton only, sediment only,  nekton and sediment, and control mesocosms with no nekton or sediment for comparison of the treatments.  As water continues to ebb, the experimental mesocosms are allowed to become isolated simulating a natural intertidal pool.  Water samples are taken at time of isolation and just before the mesocosms are once again penetrated at the following flood tide.  From these measurements we can assess the difference in the amount each treatment has contributed to the nutrients within a mesocosm.

Large Mesocosm (Laboratory) Experiments

    We are also conducting a set of similar laboratory experiments using a larger mesocosm designed to mimic a natural tidal creek.  One of the advantages of conducting laboratory experiments to test ecological questions is that many variables naturally inherent to nature can be controlled.  For example, the use of an "artificial" tidal creek allows us to control factors such as water flow, volume, length of isolation, as well as the abundance and biomass of nekton that are in our experimental creek.  Therefore, laboratory experiments are very valuable in that they enable us to remove some of the variability in our data which may inhibit us from detecting differences between our treatments in a natural setting.  Furthermore, laboratory experiments help us confirm that the results that we are getting from field experiments are truly due to the treatments and not some unforeseeable variable.  Our artificial tidal creek consists of two separate sides, each with shallow, middle and deep water levels.  the mesocosm is then filled with seawater.  A known amount of nekton are then placed in one side of the mesocosm while the other side is left absent of nekton.  Water quality measurements and samples are taken at hour intervals for a set period of time and differences in nutrient concentrations are compared between nekton and no nekton sides of the mesocosm.

System-Wide Growth

    Data from previous studies in North Inlet, South Carolina have shown that creek geomorphology is an important factor affecting which creeks nekton may prefer to utilize.  Several factors, including the steepness of the bank, bottom type and water velocity have been shown to be important to fish utilization.  If geomorphology is important factor then it may be expected that fish may show a preference, or fidelity to some creeks over others.  Of course, for nekton to exhibit fidelity to a particular habitat it may be hypothesized that there is some benefit for them to do so.  One of our hypotheses is that due to the geomorphology of the intertidal creeks, fishes who inhabit creeks on a regular basis incur a selective advantage through the availability resources and increased growth rates.  In an effort to examine this question we have been conducting site fidelity experiments and system wide growth monitoring within selected tidal creeks.  To assess site fidelity we are capturing nekton within specified locations and marking them with a distinctive site specific marker such as a fin clip.  Nekton are then release and recsampled at various locations on a later date.  All nekton containing a mark are recorded to see whether or not they were found in a different location. 
    Concurrent to our site fidelity work, we are also capturing nekton from selected creeks over the entire growing season.  Once captured, nekton are identified and subamples are taken for length and weight analysis.  By-species length-weight measurements from specific creeks over an entire season will allow us to assess whether or not certain creeks tend to have nekton with greater growth rates than others.   A possible connection of this study to our tidal creek nutrients work is that we expect that if some creeks support greater nekton growth rates (and greater relative biomass), then these same creeks should also be greater contributors of nutrients to the system.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Electronically measuring fish for length-weight analysis

 

Phase III (Winter-Summer 2007)

    During our 3rd and final phase of the project we will be using the results obtained from the previous two years of the study to broaden our scope on the contribution of nekton to nutrients within North Inlet, South Carolina. There will be a continuation of our field and laboratory mesocosm experiments during the winter and summer months to see if there are differences in nekton contribution by season. We will investigate our questions regarding nekton site fidelity and how it relates to differences in growth rates.  In addition to growth, we will be aging fish sampled during the 2006 season to see if fishes of difference size were of the same age.  If we can confirm that fishes from our selected creeks are of similar age then size differences may be due to differential resource availability. Resource availability can  affect fish growth in several ways.  As a result, we will also assess fish condition through the analysis of total lipid content.  Condition data will give us information on whether or not fishes from different creeks are just increasing in length or in total stored fat as well.  If some fishes are in fact "fatter" in some creeks than others, then they may have a selective advantage upon migration out of the estuary to inhabit offshore areas during the winter where food is more scarce.  During the winter, after this next years new recruits have entered the estuary as larvae and become postal-larval juveniles, we will begin collecting these individuals to see what locations are inhabited first and what size and age they are when they 1st enter the creeks.  We also intend to look at the composition and distribution of benthic prey within our spatial growth creeks.